Lingo Telecom has agreed to pay a $1 million fine following accusations by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that the company transmitted fraudulent robocalls impersonating President Joe Biden. These calls were allegedly intended to dissuade voters in New Hampshire’s Democratic primary election, according to a report from Reuters.
The FCC stated that Lingo used advanced generative artificial intelligence voice-cloning technology to produce the spoofed calls, which were orchestrated by political consultant Steve Kramer. The calls were part of an effort to spread disinformation, according to the commission. The New Hampshire state attorney general’s office has also charged Kramer in connection with these robocalls.
Initially, the FCC had proposed a $2 million fine against Lingo for its role in transmitting the calls in January. As part of the settlement, Lingo is now required to implement a comprehensive compliance plan that ensures strict adherence to the FCC’s caller ID authentication rules. Despite multiple requests, Lingo has not provided a comment on the settlement, per Reuters.
“This settlement sends a strong message that communications service providers are the first line of defense against these threats and will be held accountable to ensure they do their part to protect the American public,” said Loyaan Egal, the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau Chief, in a statement.
In addition to the settlement with Lingo, the FCC has also proposed a $6 million fine against Kramer for his involvement in the robocalls.
Featured News
Court Dismisses Monopoly Claims Against Tempur Sealy
Oct 18, 2024 by
CPI
Philadelphia City Council Advances Legislation to Tackle Rent Price-Fixing
Oct 17, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Probes Deere for Potential Anti-Competitive Repair Practices
Oct 17, 2024 by
CPI
Britain’s Ofcom to Outline Strict Guidelines for Tackling Illegal Online Content
Oct 17, 2024 by
CPI
EU Considers Expanding Potential Fines for X, Targeting Musk’s Broader Business Empire
Oct 17, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh