![](https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/shutterstock_1111565900-e1632302733860.jpg)
In a narrow 3–2 vote, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has opted to reinstate net neutrality regulations, overturning the repeal pushed through during the Trump administration. This decision, The VERGE reported, has sparked intense debate among commissioners and industry stakeholders alike.
Net neutrality, the principle that internet service providers (ISPs) should treat all online content equally without discrimination, has been a contentious issue for years. The FCC’s move aims to prevent ISPs from throttling or blocking specific websites or services, as well as from offering paid prioritization to certain traffic.
Democratic FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel emphasized the critical role of broadband in modern life, asserting that internet access has transitioned from a luxury to a necessity. “Broadband is now an essential service,” she stated, underscoring the need for basic oversight to ensure fair access for all users.
However, the decision has not been without opposition. Republican FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr vehemently opposed the use of Title II reclassification to enforce net neutrality, arguing that it could lead to regulatory overreach and inhibit innovation. Carr criticized the FCC’s approach, likening it to a broader issue of executive branch influence over agency decisions.
The debate also touched on concerns regarding the FCC’s authority to regulate ISP pricing. While the FCC’s order includes forbearance from rate regulation, critics worry that this could change in the future, potentially stifling investment and competition in the industry.
Democratic Commissioner Geoffrey Starks defended the rules, emphasizing the FCC’s clear authority to apply Title II to broadband providers. Starks advocated for measures to ensure affordable internet access, including support for the Affordable Connectivity Program, which provides subsidies for low-income consumers.
Featured News
India’s Zee Entertainment and Sony Settle Dispute Over Failed $10 Billion Merger
Aug 27, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Malaysia’s Tech Regulations Move Forward Despite Industry Concerns
Aug 27, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Ex-Google Execs Fight DOJ Subpoenas in Advertising Monopolization Case
Aug 27, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Claims Against Jazz and Hikma to Proceed in Price-Fixing Case
Aug 27, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
DOJ Suit Centers On Ticketmaster’s SafeTix, Alleging Anti-Competitive Market Control
Aug 27, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – State Attorneys General
Aug 22, 2024 by
CPI
CPI Talks… …With Attorney General Phil Weiser
Aug 22, 2024 by
CPI
The Bipartisan Miracle of State Antitrust Enforcement
Aug 22, 2024 by
Gwendolyn J. Lindsay Cooley
Recent Developments in State Antitrust Enforcement: Agriculture and Food Markets
Aug 22, 2024 by
Elizabeth R. Odette
State Attorneys General: Stewards of Consumer Health and Welfare
Aug 22, 2024 by
Brooke Howlett Lovrovich