A federal judge in Illinois has dismissed a high-profile lawsuit that accused prominent investment advisory firms, including Fidelity and Charles Schwab, of conspiring to stifle industry competition and inflate consumer costs. The ruling, issued by U.S. District Judge LaShonda Hunt on Monday, found that the plaintiff’s claims lacked the necessary factual basis to support allegations of illegal collusion in violation of U.S. antitrust laws.
According to Reuters, Judge Hunt’s 36-page order criticized the lawsuit for being “heavy on theories and labels and light on details,” describing it as “lengthy, repetitive, and convoluted.” The judge determined that the investment advisor behind the lawsuit, Stephen Greco, did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate his claims.
Greco, who is the CEO of Spotlight Asset Group and a former national director of wealth management at Creative Planning, had filed the lawsuit in 2022. His complaint alleged various federal law violations, including antitrust breaches, fraud, interference with business contracts, and false advertising. In the lawsuit, Greco claimed that Fidelity, Schwab, and other defendants were engaged in anti-competitive practices designed to undermine Spotlight and hinder market competition.
In separate statements, Fidelity and Schwab welcomed the judge’s decision, with Schwab noting that despite the extensive length of the complaint, it “still failed to lay out a plausible case.” Creative Planning, another defendant in the case, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Greco’s legal team, which includes Daniel Petrocelli of O’Melveny & Myers for TD Ameritrade and Charles Schwab, Boris Bershteyn of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom for Fidelity, and Andrew Schapiro of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan for Creative Planning, did not provide immediate responses to inquiries.
The court has given the plaintiffs until October 4 to file a proposed amended lawsuit if they wish to pursue the case further. The case, titled Greco et al v FMR LLC et al, is being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois under case number 1:22-cv-02661.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Musk’s X Requests Brazil Supreme Court to Resume Service After Shutdown
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
Visa Acquires AI Firm Featurespace to Enhance Fraud Prevention
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
Visa Gears Up for Legal Fight with DOJ Over Debit Card Monopoly Allegations
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
UFC Fighters’ Lawsuit Settlement Resurfaces with $375 Million Offer
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
Ex-Amazon Seller Appario Files Lawsuit to Dismiss Antitrust Allegations
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández