FIFA, the global governing body for football, is facing increased scrutiny from the European Union’s (EU) antitrust regulators following a complaint lodged by several prominent European football organizations. According to DevDiscourse, these entities accuse FIFA of abusing its dominant position by expanding the international football schedule in a manner that could harm players and disrupt club operations.
The core of the complaint centers on the increased strain being placed on footballers due to the growing number of matches in the international calendar. This concern is amplified by the upcoming expansion of the FIFA Club World Cup, which is set to grow from seven to 32 teams, and will occupy nearly a month in the United States. European football entities argue that such expansions risk causing player fatigue and increasing injuries, as well as creating scheduling conflicts with club-level tournaments. The physical and mental well-being of players has been cited as a critical issue, with critics suggesting that FIFA is prioritizing commercial interests over the welfare of athletes.
Javier Tebas, the president of Spain’s LaLiga, has been particularly vocal in his criticism, accusing FIFA of acting out of self-interest and neglecting the broader implications of these decisions on the football ecosystem. Per DevDiscourse, Tebas and other European football leaders believe that the expanded tournament will not only impact players but also disrupt pre-season preparations for many clubs, potentially affecting their commercial activities, such as lucrative pre-season tours.
Related: Biden Administration Supports Antitrust Suit Against FIFA
FIFA, however, maintains that the expanded schedule was implemented after extensive consultations with stakeholders across the football world, including representatives from Europe. FIFA’s defense has been that the new calendar reflects a balanced approach to growing the sport while maintaining dialogue with global football organizations.
Interestingly, UEFA, the governing body for European football, is not part of the complaint despite the fact that it has also increased its own match schedule with the expansion of the Champions League. UEFA’s decision to stay out of the conflict is reportedly due to its ongoing discussions with European leagues, demonstrating a more cooperative approach to navigating the increasingly crowded football calendar.
As tensions between FIFA and European football organizations continue to escalate, the outcome of the antitrust investigation could have significant ramifications for the future of international football.
Source: DevDiscourse
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand