FIFA, the governing body of international football, has been hit with a €150,000 administrative fine after a German court found the organization to have violated a ruling made in favor of agents.
The district court in Dortmund, Germany, said FIFA’s regulations ignored the difference between agents operating in Germany and within the European Union. As seen by dpa, the ruling said FIFA had failed to take the verdict from May into consideration.
The new regulations, brought into effect on 1 January, intended to make the football transfer system fairer and more transparent. As part of these rules, a FIFA license became mandatory for agents with a cap imposed on fees they can charge. The transition period for these regulations ends on 1 October, with only licensed agents then allowed to work in the industry.
Read more: Appeals Court Rules FIFA, US Soccer Must Face Antitrust Suit
A representative from FIFA said they had taken note of the ruling and had already begun the appeal process. “FIFA said that it had taken note of the ruling and that it ‘has already initiated appeal proceedings against the interim injunction and reserves the right to appeal against the latest writ of execution,” said the representative.
This is not the first time the German Football Federation (DFB) has run into trouble with similar regulations. The Dortmund court also imposed the same €150,000 administrative fine on the DFB earlier in the year. The DFB regulations have since been referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ), where they are being tested against European antitrust laws.
This latest ruling from the Dortmund court serves as a clear reminder of the importance of fairness and transparency throughout the football agent and transfer system. It will be interesting to see how FIFA responds to this ruling.
Source: Star Connect Media
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand