By: Brooke Fox, Fiona Scott Morton & Gene Kimmelman (ProMarket)
Sen. Amy Klobuchar recently invoked David and Goliath when discussing her fight to pass antitrust legislation to rein in dominant tech firms. “I have two lawyers. They have 2,800 lawyers and lobbyists,” she said at this year’s Code Conference in September. But executives at those dominant tech firms would do well to remember that Goliath ultimately lost to David.
Whether or not Klobuchar’s legislation makes it to a vote this term, we’ve crossed a Rubicon. Whatever legitimate (or illegitimate) concerns may be raised about the precise wording of the bill, the fact is that Europe has already prohibited dominant tech platforms from thwarting competitors in search services, operating systems, app stores, online retail and numerous other digital markets.
It would be irresponsible for U.S. policymakers to sit on the sidelines and let others set the rules—a fact perhaps recognized by the 242 members of the House of Representatives who voted in favor of the Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act, designed to strengthen antitrust enforcement. While that bill did not single out big tech companies, it passed in spite of significant opposition from the likes of Google and Amazon, a sign that lawmakers are no longer afraid to move against the industry’s wishes.
European lawmakers have levied ever-increasing fines on tech platforms over the years, but not before bad behavior became entrenched, and little has changed in terms of market outcomes. Each time the EU issues a decision against a platform, the platform must design a remedy and present it to the regulator, which usually deems the proposal inadequate and orders the whole process to restart, according to Cristina Caffarra, who leads European economic analysis at Keystone Strategy. “There’s no end to this game, which is played in a situation of significant asymmetry of information,” she said. “So you end up in a situation in which the remedies are completely failing to do anything.”
Not content to let the status quo persist, the European Commission this year passed sweeping new legislation to oversee digital gatekeepers in the form of the Digital Markets Act. The DMA requires digital platforms doing business in the EU to comply with nearly two dozen rules, which prohibit practices such as pre-installing certain apps on devices, obligating standards such as interoperability and constraining the ability of users to move their data between apps…
Featured News
Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Motorola Accuses UK of Antitrust Breach Over Terminated Emergency Services Contract
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Amazon Must Face Antitrust Case Over Alleged Monopoly Practices
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
US Appeals Court Blocks FCC’s Move to Reinstate Net Neutrality Rules
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Nvidia’s $700 Million Buyout of Run:ai Gets EU Approval, Deal Finalized
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand