The Supreme Administrative Court has imposed penalty payments of approximately €9 million (US$9.98 million) in the bus cartel case. According to the Supreme Administrative Court, the parties have systematically hindered the opening of the bus market to competition, thereby harming consumers. While the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority (FCCA) is satisfied with the ruling, it also considers it to be important that guidelines for fines be created in Finland.
In January 2016, the FCCA submitted a proposal to the Market Court under which a penalty payment amounting to more than €30 million (US$33.3 million) should be imposed on the coach companies, the Finnish Bus and Coach Association, and Matkahuolto. Working in agreement, the companies sought to prevent market opening and the access to the market of new competitors. The parties in the cartel excluded new regular services from Matkahuolto’s Timetable and Ticket Purchase Services as well as Parcel Services.
In its ruling of December 2017, the Market Court found that the coach companies—the Finnish Bus and Coach Association and Matkahuolto—were guilty of a cartel, ordering each of them to pay a €100,000 (US$110,856) penalty payment for prohibited restriction of competition. The FCCA considered the penalty payments insufficient, appealing the case to the Supreme Administrative Court.
Full Content: KKV
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand