Former EU Antitrust Chief Warns Against National Champions in European Competition Strategy
Former European Union antitrust chief Mario Monti issued a cautionary note on Wednesday against the creation of national champions as a strategy to bolster the competitiveness of European businesses, particularly in the face of increasing global competition, notably from China.
Monti, who served as Italy’s Prime Minister and as the European Commission’s competition commissioner from 1999 to 2004, highlighted potential repercussions and the risk of weakening competition enforcement, reported Reuters.
Monti’s remarks come amid heightened discussions within the EU on how to enhance the region’s competitiveness, with Mario Draghi and Enrico Letta, both Italians, slated to present reports commissioned by the EU executive. These reports are expected to emphasize the role of state aid and advocate for more protectionist measures to support European businesses in critical sectors, aiming to level the playing field against international rivals.
During an OECD conference, Monti underscored the challenges European national champions could face outside the EU. He drew attention to the 2001 transatlantic dispute when the EU blocked the merger between General Electric (GE) and Honeywell, despite approval from U.S. authorities. The decision was criticized, with accusations that the EU prioritized protecting local interests over fostering competition.
Reflecting on the GE-Honeywell case, Monti highlighted that the merger was blocked in the EU due to legitimate concerns under EU laws, effectively preventing the merged entity from operating within the broader EU market. He acknowledged the desire for European champions but cautioned against policies that might compromise competition authorities’ impartiality and effectiveness.
Monti’s warnings echoed concerns about the potential misuse of competition enforcement powers to promote national champions, which could ultimately prove counterproductive. He emphasized that such actions could jeopardize the intended outcomes, undermining competitiveness rather than bolstering it.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand