The Attorneys General of Indiana, Massachusetts, Nevada, and Washington have joined the ongoing civil antitrust lawsuit against Apple.
This lawsuit, originally filed by the Justice Department along with 15 states and the District of Columbia in March, accuses Apple of monopolizing various smartphone markets in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act. The amended complaint, now supported by 20 co-plaintiffs, was filed in the District of New Jersey.
Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division expressed enthusiasm about the expanded coalition.
“We welcome the States of Indiana, Massachusetts, Nevada and Washington, who join our existing coalition to restore competition in the smartphone markets that Apple has monopolized,” Kanter stated.
“We look forward to litigating this important case alongside our state partners to deliver the benefits of competition to consumers, app developers, accessory makers and the American public.”
Related: Apple Denies EU Competition Law Violation Ahead of Fine Decision
The lawsuit alleges that Apple “illegally maintains a monopoly over smartphones by selectively imposing contractual restrictions on, and withholding critical access points from, developers.”
These practices, according to the Justice Department, hinder the development of apps, products, and services that could lessen consumer dependence on the iPhone or reduce costs for both consumers and developers.
As the case advances in the District of New Jersey, the expanded coalition aims to challenge Apple’s market dominance and foster a more competitive environment.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand