Apple has been hit with a complaint from the French antitrust watchdog over allegations it has imposed unfair conditions for the use of user data in advertising.
According to the French Autorite De La Concurrence, Apple’s practices in the sector of app distribution are discriminating, non-objective and non-transparent. This decision is the result of a 2020 complaint by four French advertising associations.
Apple, in defense of itself, stated: “The mechanism gives users more control by requiring all apps to ask permission before tracking them.” This statement follows rule violations with European Union privacy regulations that the four associations alleged to have taken place.
The Autorite De La Concurrence made it clear that they would be available for any mediation between Apple and the associations to make sure the current regulations reflect the wishes of the users and the companies involved.
Read more: Apple Battles Subpoenas In US Court Against Qualcomm
In response to the message of objection, Apple said it was “surprised” and “disappointed” by the regulator’s position and was “committed to working with the Autorite De La Concurrence”. They also stated that “consumer privacy and data security are fundamental to our products and services” and are working on incorporating transparency and clarity on their procedures.
Apple’s recent practices have sparked a debate within the tech world about the company’s commitment to user privacy and data protection. The statement of objection is seen as a step to protect consumers from unfair practices within the industry.
Apple has the opportunity to work with the Autorite De La Concurrence to ensure the correct use of user data. In the meantime, users will have to monitor their data closely and are encouraged to take control of their privacy and use their data responsibly.
Source: Investing
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand