The Federal Trade Commission has suggested revisions to the premerger notification form and notification regulations that enforce the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, which mandates that firms report sizeable transactions to the FTC and Justice Department for antitrust examination.
The process of complying with the HSR Act and its regulations for mergers and acquisitions requires the completion of HSR Forms and a waiting period prior to finalizing the transaction.
The proposed changes to the HSR would improve the ability of agencies to screen transactions for potential competition issues during the 30-day waiting period. The FTC considers this competition review important for identifying deals that may violate antitrust laws and taking appropriate action.
Related: The DOJ and FTC RFI on Merger Enforcement: Commentary on Labor Market and Non-Price Effects
“Much has changed in the 45 years since the HSR Act was passed. Deal volume, for example, has soared. The House Report for the HSR Act estimated that the statute would ‘require advance notice’ for approximately ‘the largest 150 mergers annually,’” FTC Chair Lina Khan said in a June 27 statement on the proposed changes. “Today, the agencies often receive more than 150 filings each month. Transactions are increasingly complex, in both deal structure and potential competitive impact. Investment vehicles have also changed, alongside major transformations in how firms do business.”
Key changes in the proposal include:
– Providing details about transaction rationale and surrounding investment vehicles or corporate relationships.
– Provision of information related to products or services in horizontal products and services and non-horizontal business relationships, such as supply agreements.
– Providing projected revenue streams, transactional analyses and internal documents describing market conditions, and structure of entities involved such as private equity investments.
– Provision of details regarding previous acquisitions.
– Disclosure of information that screens for labor market issues by classifying employees based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Standard Occupational Classification System categories.
The notice is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register this week, and comments will be accepted for 60 days following publication.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand