The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is reportedly investigating “several” cryptocurrency firms.
The agency, which enforces laws that require truth in advertising, is looking into whether the firms ran deceptive or misleading advertisements, Bloomberg reported Monday (Dec. 5).
Reached for comment, an FTC spokesperson told PYMNTS via email, “While we can’t comment on current events in the crypto markets or the details of any ongoing investigations, we are investigating several firms for possible misconduct concerning digital assets.”
This news comes about two weeks after Bloomberg reported that celebrities who endorsed now-bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX were facing at least three lawsuits from people attempting to recover their losses.
Celebrities who promoted the firm could be held liable for damages if the lawsuits proceed, especially if those products are found to be securities.
The lawsuits alleged that these endorsements drew in unsophisticated investors.
Related: US FTC Probes $200M Bitmark Crypto Hack
About two months before that, Kim Kardashian agreed to pay a $1.26 million fine in a case that revolved around her “touting” of the EthereumMax cryptocurrency — which the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) says is a security under its jurisdiction — without properly disclosing that she had received financial compensation for doing so.
The SEC has filed several similar cases over other cryptocurrency offerings dating back to 2018, including a case against Floyd Mayweather Jr. and DJ Khaled, and one against Steven Seagal — all of whom settled.
In February, the Wall Street Journal reported that numerous crypto exchanges had been paying top dollar to run ads during the Super Bowl, which is still one of the most expensive advertising slots on TV.
Sponsorship consulting firm IEG said at the time that crypto industry spending on sports sponsorships could amount to over $160 million for North American companies — more than the amount being spent by airlines, quick-service restaurants and wine and spirits companies.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand