Amgen has received the go-ahead to continue its acquisition of Horizon Therapeutics with a $27.8 billion deal, but the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has put forth a settlement that prevents Amgen from using anticompetitive tactics to extend its market dominance.
The settlement prohibits Amgen from bundling any of its products with Tepezza or Krystexxa, or using any product rebate or contract term to exclude or disadvantage competing products. FTC Chair Lina Khan said in a statement, “While the companies do not have drugs that directly compete with one another, Commission staff focused on the deal rationale and assessed how the acquisition would change the combined firm’s power and incentive to thwart competition.”
The settlement also prevents Amgen from buying any competitors to the two Horizon drugs without the FTC’s permission, and Wells Fargo analyst Mohit Bansal says this is likely to hinder future deals in the sector. He said, “I believed that the FTC is now scrutinizing bigger deals more, and added that I expected drugmakers would want to stay under the radar with smaller acquisitions.”
Read more: FTC Sues To Stop Amgen’s $27.8 Billion Horizon Therapeutics Buy
Despite the limitations imposed by the settlement, Amgen claims they will have “no impact on Amgen’s business”. In response to concerns that the acquisition could lead to insufficient access to affordable drugs, Khan said, “The bundling and exclusionary rebating practices at issue in this matter highlight deeper concerns about how pharmaceutical companies and pharmacy benefit managers may work together to deprive Americans of access to affordable drugs.”
The deal is expected to be finalized in the fourth quarter of this year, and will bring together two giants in the pharmaceutical industry. Amgen has established itself as a leader in innovation and development, while Horizon Therapeutics has built a trusting brand among patients.
Moving forward, the new combined firm will need to refrain from using anticompetitive tactics in order to remain in the good graces of the FTC. The settlement undoubtedly serves as a reminder to companies that they must be mindful of their dealings when it comes to consolidation in the pharmaceutical sector.
Source: WSJ
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand