The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has reportedly informed Japan’s Seven & i Holdings of its intention to investigate a potential acquisition of the 7-Eleven convenience store chain by Canadian company Alimentation Couche-Tard, due to antitrust concerns, according to a Reuters report.
Alimentation Couche-Tard made a $38.5 billion offer to acquire Seven & i, but the Japanese retail giant rejected the bid, citing concerns over U.S. antitrust regulations. Per Reuters, the FTC notified Seven & i of its plan to investigate the deal following the public announcement of the offer on August 19. The information comes from a source familiar with the situation who requested anonymity, as they were not authorized to speak publicly.
If this deal proceeds, it would become the largest acquisition of a Japanese company by a foreign buyer in history. However, in addition to potential U.S. regulatory hurdles, the proposed takeover is expected to face scrutiny in Japan as well, with two mergers and acquisitions lawyers noting that the transaction could come under review under the country’s Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act.
Seven & i operates more than 12,500 7-Eleven stores across the U.S., while Couche-Tard owns over 7,000 convenience stores, according to data from food consultancy firm Technomic. Combined, the two companies would control nearly 20,000 stores across the U.S., which would place them far ahead of their closest competitor, Casey’s. Together, they would also employ over 200,000 people.
The prospect of such a large consolidation in the U.S. market has sparked concerns from antitrust regulators. The Biden administration has been particularly proactive in challenging mergers and acquisitions, both through legal challenges and in the court of public opinion. As a result, several companies have reconsidered or abandoned major deals in recent years out of fear they would be blocked by regulators.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand