The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has announced a proposed order that would prohibit health information technology company Surescripts from engaging in exclusionary conduct and executing or enforcing non-compete agreements with current and former employees.
This comes after a favorable federal court ruling found Surescripts possess a near-total monopoly power in e-prescribing services, known as a ‘supershare’ of 95%.
In April 2019, the FTC charged Surescripts with allegedly employing illegal vertical and horizontal restraints to maintain its power over two electronic prescribing, or ‘e-prescribing,’ markets: routing and eligibility.
FTC Bureau of Competition Director Holly Vedova spoke on the announcement, issuing a statement that read: “The proposed order is a victory in creating a fair and competitive playing field in the e-prescription drug market. In large part because of Surescripts’ conduct, virtually everyone today who has a prescription filled electronically does so via the Surescripts networks.”
Read more: FTC Prepares to Challenge Amazon’s Business Practices: Politico
The proposed order has a 20-year term and would prohibit Surescripts from engaging in the exclusionary conduct deemed illegal by the FTC in its complaint.
The order is part of a continuing effort to protect competition and open markets, increasing the options for consumers and lowering costs.
The FTC is expected to conduct a survey of the industry in the immediate future, and the survey outcomes will have a huge impact on the final decision. The proposed order will not be finalized until after this survey is completed and the FTC has evaluated the results. Until then, the Bureau of Competition is confident that this proposed order will provide a much-needed check on Surescripts’ power and make the market fairer for all.
Source: FTC Gov
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand