The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has ordered Guardian Service Industries, Inc., a building services contractor operating in New York and New Jersey, to halt its enforcement of no-hire agreements that allegedly limit employment opportunities for its workers. The action follows an FTC investigation and complaint asserting that these agreements unfairly constrain employee mobility and hinder competition in the building services sector.
Allegations of Restrictive Practices
According to the FTC, Guardian’s service agreements with residential building owners include clauses that prevent these owners and competing contractors from hiring Guardian’s employees. These restrictions reportedly apply even after the termination of a service contract, forcing workers—such as concierge staff, custodians, and maintenance technicians—to leave their jobs if a building changes service providers.
The FTC contends that these no-hire agreements undermine workers’ ability to negotiate better wages, benefits, and working conditions. Henry Liu, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, criticized Guardian’s practices, stating that they “restrained job mobility, wage growth, and economic freedom” for low-wage workers while stifling competition in the building services industry.
Proposed Consent Order
Under a proposed consent order, Guardian is required to stop enforcing and communicating about no-hire agreements. The order also mandates several corrective actions, including:
- Informing current and prospective customers, as well as employees, that the no-hire agreements are no longer in effect.
- Posting clear notices to employees, including in shared spaces, that their employment is not subject to no-hire restrictions.
- Nullifying all existing no-hire agreements and notifying the FTC in writing of their termination.
- Ensuring that no penalties or fees are imposed on individuals previously subject to these agreements.
The FTC emphasized that these measures aim to restore a competitive environment in the industry and improve economic opportunities for affected workers.
Collaboration with State Authorities
The FTC acknowledged the support of the Attorneys General offices in New York and New Jersey during its investigation. The agency plans to publish the consent agreement in the Federal Register for public comment. Interested parties will have 30 days to submit feedback before the agreement is finalized.
Split Decision Among Commissioners
The FTC’s decision to issue the complaint and accept the proposed agreement was passed by a 3-2 vote. Chair Lina M. Khan and Commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro M. Bedoya supported the action, while Commissioners Holyoak and Ferguson dissented, each issuing separate statements outlining their positions.
Source: FTC
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand