In early December 2021, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC), along with several state co-plaintiffs (New York, California, Illinois, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia), filed an order in court indicating a $40 million settlement had been reached with Vyera Pharmaceuticals. Readers may remember the “pharma bro” saga with former Vyera CEO Martin Shkreli, during which Vyera raise the price of Daraprim from $17.50 to $750 per tablet in 2015.
The order follows a January 2020 complaint against Shkreli, his associate Kevin Mulleady, their company Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC, and its parent company Phoenixus AG. Enforcers alleged that Shkreli (currently in prison for securities fraud) and Mulleady raised the price of Daraprim by 4000 percent and then created an elaborate web of restrictions to illegally block competitors from producing a cheaper option.
The complaint alleges that Shkreli and Mulleady started Vyera with a plan to purchase a life-saving drug, raise the price significantly, and use anticompetitive contracts to block competition. Vyera acquired Daraprim in 2015 and immediately raised the list price from $17.50 to $750 per tablet.
According to the complaint, after acquiring the drug and raising the list price, Vyera created a web of anticompetitive restrictions to box out the competition. Some of the anticompetitive actions included entering into resale-restriction agreements with distributors that prevented generic companies from procuring the drug for FDA-mandated testing; entering into exclusivity agreements with the suppliers of a critical input known as pyrimethamine API; and signing data-blocking agreements with two key distributors to prevent them from releasing Daraprim sales data, which masked the true size of the market opportunity for potential generic competitors.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand