The Group of Seven (G7) industrial nations is set to establish a code of conduct for companies engaged in the development of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems, according to a G7 document. Governments are increasingly concerned about the potential risks and misuse of AI technology, prompting this voluntary code of conduct.
The forthcoming code is seen as a significant milestone in how major countries will oversee AI, addressing issues related to privacy and security risks. The document, as reported by Reuters, emphasizes that the code aims to “help seize the benefits and address the risks and challenges brought by these technologies.”
Key provisions of the code include urging companies to take proactive measures to identify, evaluate, and mitigate risks throughout the entire AI lifecycle. Additionally, it emphasizes the need to address incidents and patterns of misuse once AI products are on the market.
Read more: G-7 Calls for ‘Consistent and Comprehensive’ Crypto Regulation
To enhance transparency and accountability, the code calls for companies to publish public reports outlining the capabilities and limitations of their AI systems, as well as how they can be used and potentially misused. It also recommends substantial investments in robust security controls, reported Reuters.
The European Union (EU) has been at the forefront of AI regulation, notably with its stringent AI Act. In contrast, countries like Japan, the United States, and nations in Southeast Asia have adopted a more hands-off approach to encourage economic growth.
Vera Jourova, the digital chief of the European Commission, underscored the significance of the code of conduct during a forum on internet governance in Kyoto, Japan. She emphasized that the code serves as a strong foundation for ensuring safety and will act as a bridge until formal regulations are in place.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand