![](https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/shutterstock_1056443909-e1632309741672.jpg)
By:
(Covington Competition)The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report on October 17, 2023, focusing on mergers and acquisitions (M&A) within the defense industrial base. The report highlights the existing M&A review process within the Department of Defense (DOD) and provides recommendations for enhancing the assessment of M&A competition risks. Currently, the DOD’s Industrial Base Policy (IBP) office, in collaboration with DOD stakeholders, offers recommendations on transactions that could impact the defense industrial base, especially when requested by the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission (the Antitrust Agencies). Although the DOD does not have a formal role in determining the outcome of antitrust reviews, it contributes insights into the competitive effects of these transactions.
The GAO report concludes that the DOD has historically played a reactive role in the review of M&A in the defense industry. This reactive stance has resulted in missed opportunities to identify transactions that could harm the defense industrial base and overlook potential risks for DOD programs. The report attributes this reactive posture to a lack of clear guidance and insufficient resources for those responsible for providing DOD’s views to the Antitrust Agencies. The DOD’s M&A policy, outlined in DOD Directive 5000.62, offers guidelines for assessing M&A in the defense industrial base but lacks a structured methodology for conducting assessments.
Moreover, the GAO report notes that the IBP office has limited resources, reducing its capacity to monitor transactions that may be subject to reporting under the HSR Act but lack an apparent defense connection. It also limits the ability to analyze defense-related M&A beyond the HSR Act’s scope or perform macro-level trend analyses. As a result, IBP officials tend to prioritize large transactions for their attention, using the Antitrust Agencies’ inquiries as a proxy for identifying high-risk M&A deals. The report reveals that, between fiscal years 2018 and 2022, DOD assessed about 40 M&A transactions annually, primarily exceeding the HSR Act’s size of transaction threshold. It also highlights that DOD monitored only two completed M&A transactions in the past decade, both initiated at the Antitrust Agencies’ request…
Featured News
Nvidia and Microsoft Sued for Allegedly Undercutting AI Technology Patent Prices
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
White & Case Strengthens Antitrust and M&A Practices with New Partner Additions
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawyers’ Fee Demand Over JetBlue-Spirit Deal
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Boston Landlords Named as US Sues RealPage Over Alleged Rent-Inflating Practices
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Judge to Weigh Landmark NCAA Settlement Proposal in Antitrust Lawsuit
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI