The German competition watchdog has announced antitrust investigations against PayPal.
In a statement on Monday (Jan. 23), the Bundeskartellamt (BKartA) said it is probing the payment company over potentially anticompetitive terms in its user agreement applicable in Germany.
Under PayPal’s terms, BKartA said that merchants aren’t allowed to offer their goods and services at lower prices if customers choose to use a payment method that is cheaper than PayPal.
Read more: Germany’s Antitrust Regulator Opens Probe Into PayPal
The global payment firm uses such clauses in many markets as a way to prevent businesses from incentivizing consumers to use alternative payment methods. But in Monday’s statement, Andreas Mundt, president of BKartA, spoke against the practice,
“These clauses might restrict competition and violate the prohibition of abuse of a dominant position,” Mundt said.
The release also pointed to provisions in PayPal’s terms of use that prohibit sellers from expressing a preference for payment methods other than PayPal or from favoring other methods by, for example, making their use more convenient.
“[BKartA] will now assess the extent of PayPal’s market power and in how far online sellers depend on offering PayPal as a payment method,” Mundt said. “If merchants are prevented from taking into account the differences in costs of various payment methods by imposing surcharges or granting discounts, it is more difficult for other and new payment schemes to compete successfully in terms of price and quality or to enter the market in the first place.”
BKartA noted that PayPal is not only the leading online payment scheme in Germany but also one of the most expensive. It adds that PayPal’s standard rate in Germany currently amounts to 2.49%-2.99% of the payment amount plus 34-39 cents per payment.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand