German Federal Cartel Office Launches Investigation Against Deutsche Post Subsidiary
The German Federal Cartel Office has recently launched an investigation against the Deutsche Post subsidiary, Inhaus Services, as well as two other companies for potentially engaging in anti-competitive practices. This investigation particularly focuses on the company’s role in mail consolidation services.
Bundeskartellamt President Andreas Mundt released a statement claiming the Office will be examining whether Deutsche Post Inhaus Services have agreements in place with competitors concerning mail consolidation services, which would restrict competition. Mail consolidation refers to a service used to efficiently process multiple parcels and letters from customers, thereby reducing costs by streamlining the process.
Read more: German Fragrance Maker Symrise, Contests EU Dawn Raids In Court
In response, a spokesperson for Deutsche Post has said its subsidiary has submitted all existing contracts with competitors to the federal network agency for scrutiny. The spokesperson also noted that the company is sure the agreements comply with competition law and will thus back their claims with evidence.
“We will examine whether the existing agreements Deutsche Post InHaus Service has in place with its direct competitors restrict competition,” said President Mundt.
“We are convinced that these agreements are also in line with competition law and will also present this to the federal cartel office,” the Deutsche Post spokesperson stated.
The outcome of the investigation should be made available in the coming months as the application of the Competition law is closely monitored in Germany. In the meantime, it is expected that the companies under Federal Cartel Office scrutiny will cooperate fully with the investigation for a successful outcome.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand