By: Ronak Kalhor-Witzel(Norton Rose Fulbright)
The case of Robert Kneschke v. LAION e.V. represents a pivotal moment in the legal framework surrounding the use of copyrighted works for AI training.
As the first case of its kind in Germany, its outcome could redefine the intersection of AI development and copyright law, setting a precedent with far-reaching consequences for the AI industry and intellectual property protection.
With numerous stakeholders closely monitoring the proceedings, the decision could impact similar legal disputes across Europe and beyond.
Robert Kneschke, a seasoned German photographer, has initiated legal proceedings against LAION e.V. (“Large-scale Artificial Intelligence Open Network”), a non-profit organization known for creating vast datasets used in AI training. Kneschke claims that LAION included his photographic images in their “LAION 5B” dataset without his consent. This dataset has been instrumental in training popular AI models like Stable Diffusion. The lawsuit, filed on April 27, 2023, in the Hamburg Regional Court, challenges the legality of using copyrighted works in this manner and demands the removal of his images from the dataset.
Legal Basis and Implications
The German Copyright Act, updated by the EU Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market in 2021, introduced provisions for text and data mining, allowing such activities for commercial purposes under specific conditions. LAION argues that their use of metadata, text data, and URLs falls within these exceptions. However, the court’s decision could redefine how AI companies handle copyrighted material, potentially necessitating new licenses and compensation models…
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand