In an ongoing legal showdown between Google and the U.S. Department of Justice, the tech giant has accused the government of seeking to penalize it for its market dominance and innovation. Google’s assertions came to light in an unsealed post-trial brief submitted to a federal judge in Washington, D.C., as part of the antitrust case levied against it by the DOJ.
Google vehemently defended its position as the preeminent search engine globally, attributing its success to relentless dedication and innovation. The company argued that any verdict against it in the antitrust trial would contravene established U.S. antitrust law. According to Google, the evidence presented during the trial irrefutably demonstrates its status as the highest-quality and most popular search engine in the United States, with superior advertising monetization. The company further contended that the DOJ’s motive is to artificially boost its competitors’ prospects at the expense of stifling innovation and harming consumers.
Read more: Google’s US Ad Antitrust Suit Trial Date Set For March 2024
Specifically addressing allegations regarding its management of Search Ads 360 (SA360), Google refuted claims of unfair practices, asserting that it is not obligated to engage with competitors like Microsoft on SA360 features. Google argued that its actions align with industry standards and that the Colorado Plaintiffs failed to substantiate any harm to competitors. The company emphasized that any punitive measures against its conduct would ultimately hinder competition by diminishing its incentives to enhance its cross-platform advertising tools in response to advertisers’ needs.
Search Ads 360 (SA360) is a pivotal platform for managing extensive search marketing campaigns across various search engines. It streamlines ad and keyword management, facilitates performance analysis, and offers automated bidding through bid strategies.
Contrary to Google’s defense, the DOJ has accused the tech giant of wielding its market dominance to stifle competition through lucrative contracts with phone manufacturers and web browser operators. These agreements purportedly aim to limit the presence of rival search engines such as Microsoft’s Bing. The DOJ is poised to present its own arguments in an upcoming brief.
Source: Martech
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand