Google must face a £13.6 billion lawsuit alleging it has abused its dominance in the U.K. online advertising market, according to a recent court ruling. The case, brought by Ad Tech Collective Action LLP, claims that the tech giant’s anti-competitive practices have led to significant financial losses for online publishers in the U.K.
Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company, attempted to dismiss the lawsuit, describing it as “incoherent.” However, the Competition Appeal Tribunal in London has decided that the case can proceed to trial.
“This is a decision of major importance to the victims of Google’s anti-competitive conduct in AdTech,” stated Claudio Pollack, a former Ofcom director and now a partner at Ad Tech Collective Action. “Google will now have to answer for its practices in a full trial.”
Despite the ruling, Google’s legal director, Oliver Bethell, labeled the lawsuit as “speculative and opportunistic,” pledging to vigorously oppose the claims on factual grounds.
The case centers on advertising technology, or AdTech, which determines the online ads users see and their associated costs. Ad Tech Collective Action argues in the U.K. lawsuit that Google’s dominant position in web search has allowed it to manipulate the AdTech market to its advantage. This alleged “self-preferencing” behavior, where Google promotes its own products and services over those of its competitors, purportedly reduces the revenue that publishers receive from hosting ads and imposes excessively high fees on them.
Related: UK’s CMA Raises Concerns, May Delay Google’s Third-Party Cookie Phase-Out
Ad Tech Collective Action contends that this conduct has stifled competition and resulted in an unfair market for U.K. publishers. Digital advertising spending reached $490 billion in 2021, highlighting the substantial economic stakes involved.
“I look forward to working with our legal and economic advisers to deliver compensation for years during which the relevant markets did not provide a competitive outcome for the UK publishing market,” Pollack said.
The legal process has been lengthy, taking eighteen months to reach this stage, with no trial date set. The case is an opt-out collective action, meaning all relevant U.K. publishers are included unless they choose to withdraw. The lawsuit is backed by an undisclosed third party, ensuring that U.K. publishers involved will not incur costs for participating.
As the legal battle unfolds, it remains to be seen how Google’s AdTech practices will be scrutinized and whether the lawsuit will lead to substantial changes in the digital advertising landscape.
Source: BBC
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand