Alphabet Inc.’s Google is facing a new privacy complaint from the Austrian advocacy group NOYB. The complaint, filed on Thursday, alleges that Google has been tracking users of its Chrome web browser without proper consent, an issue that has already drawn the attention of EU antitrust regulators.
Google is currently in the process of phasing out third-party cookies, which advertisers use to track consumer behavior, in a bid to enhance user privacy. As part of this transition, Google introduced the Privacy Sandbox—a suite of tools designed to prevent covert tracking techniques and limit data sharing with third parties. These tools aim to allow developers and publishers to measure ad performance without tracking individual users. Chrome users are given the option to enable the ad privacy feature to avoid being tracked.
However, NOYB, short for “none of your business,” claims that this feature effectively allows Google to continue tracking users within the browser. The advocacy group asserts that under European Union privacy rules, Google should first obtain explicit user consent for such tracking.
Related: Turkish Competition Authority Fines Google $14.85 Million Over Hotel Search Practices
“People thought they were agreeing to a privacy feature, but were tricked into accepting Google’s first-party ad tracking. Consent has to be informed, transparent, and fair to be legal. Google has done the exact opposite,” said Max Schrems, founder of NOYB, in a statement to Reuters. NOYB filed the complaint with the Austrian data protection authority on Thursday.
NOYB has a history of filing complaints against major tech companies for alleged privacy violations, targeting both EU and national privacy watchdogs.
In response, a Google spokesperson defended the company’s practices, emphasizing the enhanced privacy protections integrated into the Privacy Sandbox APIs. “This complaint fails to recognize the significant privacy protections we’ve built into the Privacy Sandbox APIs, including the Topics API, and the meaningful privacy improvement they provide over today’s technologies, including third-party cookies,” said the spokesperson.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand