Google parent Alphabet denied claims in an antitrust case in California federal court that the company had deleted employees’ electronic “chats” to deprive plaintiffs of evidence in their case alleging anticompetitive conduct within the Google Play Store.
Lawyers for Google at law firms Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and at Munger, Tolles & Olson in a court filing said the company had taken appropriate steps “to preserve and produce” evidence of employees’ internal chats. The company called the plaintiffs’ bid for sanctions “meritless” and asked US District Judge James Donato in San Francisco to reject the bid.
Read more: Epic Games & Match To Bring New Antitrust Allegations Against Google
Donato is presiding over a series of related cases brought since 2020 by “Fortnite” maker Epic Games Inc, consumers and dozens of US states challenging alleged exclusionary practices in how Google runs its app store. Google has denied the claims.
Judges are regularly called on to referee pretrial fights over evidence, and parties can ask courts to impose sanctions on one side for not following rules.
Google has produced information including contracts, emails, transactional data and other records as part of the litigation.
Last month, the plaintiffs’ lawyers leading cases against Google jointly askedDonato to punish Google for the alleged destruction of “substantive” chat-related information relevant to the pending antitrust claims.
A Google spokesperson on Friday declined to comment about the dispute over chat evidence, and lawyers for plaintiffs did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand