Germany’s antitrust watchdog raised initial objections regarding Google’s data practices back in January. Now, Google has agreed to make changes to provide users with more control over their data usage, according to the Federal Cartel Office (FCO) of Germany.
The commitments made by Google apply to situations where the company wants to combine personal data from one Google service with data from other Google or non-Google sources or use this data across separate Google services.
In the future, Google will be required to offer its users the option to provide clear and informed consent for data processing across its services. This will include providing choices for data combinations without employing manipulative tactics, known as “dark patterns.”
Read more: German Watchdog Probes Google’s Car-Tech Packages
We have reached out to Google for their comments on these developments and to inquire about the rollout plans, including whether it will extend beyond Germany, reported TechCrunch. It is likely that Google will implement similar changes across the European Union to comply with competition rules.
According to the FCO decision document, these commitments apply to all Google services directed at end users in Germany with more than one million monthly active users, including Android Automotive. However, Google’s core platform services designated under the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Fitbit are not covered, as Fitbit is already subject to extensive obligations regarding the processing of health and wellness data due to EU merger control.
This announcement from the FCO essentially forces Google to undo its privacy policy consolidation decision from January 2012, which combined over 60 separate privacy notices into one overarching policy. While Google claimed this move would simplify the user experience, it also allowed the company to gather more personal data, enhancing its ability to profile users and bolstering its ad-targeting business, which posed challenges for competitors without its scale in web services.
Source: Tech Crunch
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand