Google Trial: DuckDuckGo’s Bid for Apple Partnership Stymied by Google Contracts
Gabriel Weinberg, the CEO of privacy-focused search engine DuckDuckGo, testified in a landmark antitrust trial against Google’s parent company, Alphabet, on September 21, shedding light on the failed contract negotiations with tech giant Apple. According to transcripts released from the trial, Weinberg’s testimony revealed that Google’s multibillion-dollar deals with Apple had thwarted DuckDuckGo’s attempts to secure a partnership.
At the heart of the matter were Google’s annual payments of $10 billion to smartphone makers and other entities to maintain its status as the default search engine on computers and mobile devices. DuckDuckGo, founded by Weinberg himself, had aimed to challenge this dominance.
The unsealed transcript showed that DuckDuckGo had initially struck a deal with Apple in 2014, enabling its search engine to be featured as an option on Apple devices. Subsequently, DuckDuckGo began advocating for its search engine to become the default choice for users who valued privacy, limiting the collection of user data, reported Reuters.
Weinberg explained that many app developers seek to become the default option in their respective areas, such as search or maps, as changing defaults can be challenging for users.
Read more: DuckDuckGo Calls Out Google’s New Ad Retargeting Features
In 2016, Apple appeared “really interested” in DuckDuckGo, prompting discussions between the two companies in 2017 and 2018 regarding the possibility of making DuckDuckGo the default search engine for privacy-conscious users. Despite DuckDuckGo’s modest 2.5% market share in the search industry, Apple executives expressed enthusiasm.
However, during these meetings, Apple executives repeatedly raised concerns that their distribution agreements with Google might prohibit such a transition. The U.S. Department of Justice has previously disclosed that Google, which commands approximately 90% of the search market, pays around $10 billion annually to Apple and other smartphone manufacturers to secure its position as the default search engine. This strategic advantage has bolstered Google’s presence in the highly profitable advertising sector, significantly enhancing its profits.
In 2019, Apple ultimately decided against implementing the change, effectively terminating any potential agreement with DuckDuckGo, according to Weinberg’s testimony. He also noted that similar proposals made to other companies, including Samsung, faced similar resistance. Weinberg attributed these rejections to the binding nature of these companies’ contracts with Google, which acted as a significant barrier to forming partnerships with competitors.
Source: KFGO
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh