In a legal victory for Alphabet Inc.’s Google, a federal judge has once again dismissed an antitrust lawsuit accusing the tech giant of an unlawful deal with Apple that allegedly stifled competition in the search advertising market. The ruling, delivered on Friday by Judge Rita F. Lin of the US District Court for the District of Northern California, marks the second time the plaintiffs’ complaint has been thrown out of court.
According to Bloomberg, the group of internet search users who brought the case against Google had already faced a setback in February when their original complaint was dismissed. Despite amending their lawsuit, the plaintiffs failed to present a compelling case, Judge Lin ruled. The plaintiffs allege that Google agreed to share billions of dollars in profits from its search advertising business with Apple, provided Apple refrained from entering the market as a competitor. They claim this agreement violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which prohibits agreements that restrain trade and attempts to monopolize.
Read more: Google Antitrust Ruling: A Cautionary Tale for Companies on Evidence Preservation
However, per Bloomberg, Judge Lin found that the plaintiffs still lack standing to pursue antitrust claims, damages, or equitable relief under the Sherman Act. The judge criticized the amended complaint for containing conclusory allegations that were too speculative to plausibly allege antitrust injury against Google.
“To the extent the Second Amended Complaint relies on these generalized allegations of harm, they remain ‘devoid of further factual enhancement’ and are insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss,” Lin stated in her ruling.
The plaintiffs have been granted another opportunity to amend their complaint, though Judge Lin specified that no new causes of action would be permitted in the third attempt. This leaves the plaintiffs with a narrow path forward as they seek to challenge the alleged Google-Apple deal in court.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Nvidia’s $700 Million Buyout of Run:ai Gets EU Approval, Deal Finalized
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
Taiwan FTC Halts Uber’s $950M Foodpanda Buyout Over Antitrust Fears
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
White House Pushes for Stronger Healthcare Data Security
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
Microsoft’s Cybersecurity Bundles Draw Antitrust Inquiry
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
UK Watchdog to Review IBM’s $6.4 Billion Acquisition of HashiCorp
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand