Google’s data and privacy policies have been under scrutiny with its recent acquisition of the popular fitness tracking company Fitbit. Violations of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) regime by Fitbit have prompted advocacy group Noyb to file complaints in Austria, the Netherlands, and Italy.
According to Noyb, Fitbit forces its users to consent to data transfers outside the EU and does not provide the possibility to withdraw their consent, violating GDPR’s requirements. If found guilty, Fitbit could be looking at fines of up to 4% of Google’s global annual revenue, which stands at $280 billion. Noyb’s complaint asks that Fitbit be forced to share all mandatory information about the data transfers with its users and give them the ability to use the app without consenting to these transfers.
Read more: Google Accuses India’s Competition Commission of Protecting Amazon
Bernardo Armentano, Noyb’s co-founder states, “Given that the company collects the most sensitive health data, it’s astonishing that it doesn’t even try to explain its use of such data, as required by law.” He notes that this violation of GDPR could deprive Fitbit users of the ability to control the use of their data and reveals Google’s disregard for its customers’ trust.
So far, no statement from Google on this issue has been made. As the legal proceedings continue, it’s uncertain what the fate of Fitbit will be, or whether it will be allowed to continue transferring data. Nevertheless, this case has highlighted the need for Google to be more transparent with its data transfer policies.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand