Google’s own advanced AI technology, Bard, made a statement indicating that it considers the company to have a monopolistic position within the digital advertising market when asked to provide its verdict on the Justice Department’s antitrust litigation against Google.
The launch of Bard in the US on Tuesday was met with enthusiasm – only to be followed by an unexpected response, reported The New York Post. When app researcher and tech blogger Jane Manchun Wong posted screenshots of her exchanges with Bard.
“Google has a monopoly on the digital advertising market, and this has allowed the company to engage in anticompetitive behavior,” Bard said in response to Wong’s question on whether it supported the DOJ or Google in the case.
Bard claims that Google’s acquisitions and other activities in digital advertising have had negative impacts on consumers and inhibited market innovation— and said it “would side with the Justice Department.”
Read more: Google Health Looks to Handle Consumer Data With AI
The theoretical verdict quickly led Google to disavow its own creation as it battles AI rival ChatGPT.
“As we’ve said, Bard can sometimes give inaccurate or inappropriate information that doesn’t represent Google’s views and Bard should not respond in a way that endorses a particular viewpoint on subjective topics,” the company said in a statement to The Post.
Google added that Bard “trains” on publicly available content and its responses “can reflect positive or negative views of specific politicians, celebrities or other public figures, or even incorporate views on certain sides of controversial social or political issues into their responses.”
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand