Google’s “Project Bernanke,” Which Used Outsider Data To Boots Own Ads, Revealed In TX Antitrust Case
Google reportedly ran a secretive project – codenamed “Project Bernanke” – using bidding data collected from outside advertisers using its exchange to benefit the search giant’s own ad system.
The codename leaked in an erroneously unredacted document filed by Google in response to an antitrust lawsuit brought by Texas. It was reported by The Wall Street Journal on Saturday evening, April 10.
The Journal, which reviewed the unredacted filing, reported that outside advertisers weren’t told about the “Bernanke” system, which brought in millions for Google each year. The project was in place for years, the Journal reported.
The antitrust lawsuit brought by Texas in December alleged that Google used anticompetitive practices.
“Google repeatedly used its monopolistic powers to control pricing” and “engage in market collusions to rig auctions,” Attorney General Ken Paxton wrote in a Facebook post in December.
Texas alleged that the “Bernanke” project was instrumental in those efforts, according to the Journal’s reporting.
In the unredacted filing, Google reportedly wrote that information that came from the project was “comparable to data maintained by other buying tools.”
In Google’s publicly available response on April 6, the company stated the plaintiffs in Texas had a “deep misunderstanding” of the digital advertising market. The state’s case said “remarkably little about how this lawsuit would help consumers,” Google’s lawyers wrote.
“The government intervention sought by Plaintiffs would do significant harm to the many businesses, large and small, who choose to use Google’s effective advertising services, with a ripple effect of unintended consequences,” Google’s lawyers wrote.
It was unclear why the name “Bernanke” was used for the advertising project. As chair of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke led US monetary policy between 2006 and 2014.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand