The Union of Hydrocarbon Importing Companies (GEIH) of Guatemala and its members have been charged in several instances by officials in the Congress of the Republic. This was followed by the Ministry of Energy and Mines launching an investigation through the General Directorate of Hydrocarbons against the four largest importers – Uno Guatemala, Uno Petrol, Puma, and Chevron – based on articles 36 and 37 of the Hydrocarbons Marketing Law, relating to coercive pricing and price-fixing agreements.
The GEIH president Juan Ángel Díaz commented that as late as one month ago each importing company responded to the MEM regarding the opening of investigation files, and among their arguments included that the similarity of prices (for the end consumer) was due to the natural parallelism of prices and not to agreements between the companies.
The GEIH’s lawyer, Marcos Palma, said that the cases opened against importers are likely going to be dismissed because, in their view, authorities rushed to open files and present charges based on complaints that arose (in Congress) but were not analyzed appropriately. He further repeated that the seeming coordination of prices is not the consequence of an agreement price fixing “by the economic agents, but is a consequence of market forces”.
The lawyers and officials interviewed agreed in considering a competition law for the country to be vital. While no such law yet exists, a bill is is now being discussed in Congress,
Full Content: Prensa Libre
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh