![](https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/3-JUNK-FEES-AND-CABLE-TV-LESSONS-FROM-THE-TELEVISION-VIEWER-PROTECTION-ACT-Harold-Feld.jpg)
By: G. Vaughn Joy (Promarket)
In August of 2023, the Writers Guild of America (WGA), the labor union representing screenwriters, released a report titled “The New Gatekeepers: Disney, Amazon, and Netflix Shaping the Future of Media.” The report delved into the current state of Hollywood, highlighting the risks associated with the growing trend of vertical integration within the industry. Vertical integration involves a studio owning the entire process of producing, distributing, and exhibiting its content. Drawing parallels to the repealed Financial Interest and Syndication Rules (Fin-Syn) as a historical reference, the WGA advocated for the implementation of antitrust regulations, with a specific focus on the dominant players in the entertainment sector: Walt Disney Company, Amazon, and Netflix.
The Origin of Fin-Syn and the Influence of 1970s Cable Shows
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) introduced the Fin-Syn rules in 1970 to address the issue of vertical integration in the television industry. Before 1948, Hollywood itself was vertically integrated until consent decrees from the Supreme Court compelled the separation of the exhibition arms of major film studios within the Studio System.
As Hollywood adapted to the new antitrust regulations and the evolving entertainment landscape in the 1950s, the television industry gained prominence, led by three radio broadcasting companies. Throughout the 1960s, these broadcasters, operating without the same antitrust scrutiny as the film industry, consolidated their influence and adopted vertical integration practices reminiscent of earlier studios. This led to federal intervention and a renewed commitment to dismantling entertainment monopolies in 1980…
Featured News
EU Industry Chief Warns Elon Musk to Comply with EU Law Ahead of Trump Interview on X
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
US Judge Dismisses Antitrust Suit Against Google, but Consumers May Get Another Chance
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
Objections Raised Against Landmark $2.7 Billion NCAA Settlement
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
Orrick Strengthens Antitrust and Competition Practice with New Partner Hire in London
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
Austrian Group NOYB Files GDPR Complaint Against X Over AI Data Use
Aug 12, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Editorial Board Antipasto
Aug 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Enforcement in Labor Markets – A Little Less Conversation and a Little More Action
Aug 8, 2024 by
James Killick, Peter Citron & Nina Frie
The Talent Trap: Acqui-Hires and Non-Competes from an Antitrust Perspective
Aug 8, 2024 by
Kah Tham & Stephen Kinsella
Information Exchange – Pitfalls from Recent Case Law and Enforcement Practice, and How to Avoid Them
Aug 8, 2024 by
Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Nicoleta Sendrea & Riku Ode
The American Express Decision and its Critics
Aug 8, 2024 by
David Evans & Richard Schmalensee