By Eric J. Savitz, Barron’s.
All but lost in last week’s torrent of election news was the surprising defeat of Proposition 30, a California measure that would have raised tax rates on the state’s millionaires to subsidize the purchase of electric cars, shore up the state’s charging infrastructure, and provide some extra cash for firefighting in a state at constant risk of firestorm.
You’d think Californians would have loved that idea. History proves that the Golden State’s electorate has no problem raising taxes. In 2012, voters approved another measure—also called Proposition 30—that boosted taxes on incomes over $250,000 a year to help fund schools. In 2004, voters backed Proposition 63, which slapped an extra 1% tax on incomes above $1 million to fund mental health services. In Palo Alto, where I live, voters last week backed a new city business tax by a margin of 2 to 1.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand