By: Daniel McCuaig (ProMarket)
The Federal Trade Commission recently failed to stop Meta’s acquisition of virtual reality company Within, while the Department of Justice is now attempting to mitigate Google’s monopolization of the online “ad tech stack” by unwinding its 2008 purchase of DoubleClick. Daniel McCuaig outlines the parallels between the two cases and argues that consumers are threatened with anticompetitive harm if the courts continue to side with tech monopolist defendants when faced with uncertainty…
Featured News
Cooley Expands Global Antitrust Practice With Senior Leadership Appointment
May 4, 2026 by
CPI
Meatpacking Giants Face Federal Antitrust Scrutiny Over Consumer Prices
May 4, 2026 by
CPI
Maryland Becomes First State to Ban Algorithmic Pricing in Grocery Stores
May 4, 2026 by
CPI
Unanimous Senate Judiciary Committee Advances GUARD Act
May 4, 2026 by
CPI
EU Commission Pushes for Huawei, ZTE Exclusion Under New Cybersecurity Rules
May 4, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos