Posted by Social Science Research Network
In Google We Trust – Burguet, Roberto and Caminal, Ramon and Ellman, Matthew, In Google We Trust? (December 23, 2014).
Abstract: We examine the incentives of a monopolistic search engine, funded by advertising, to provide reliable search results. We distinguish two types of search result: sponsored and organic (not-paid-for). Organic results are most important in searches for online content, while sponsored results are more important in product searches. By modeling the underlying markets for online content and offline products, we can identify the sources of distortions for each type of result, and their interaction. This explicit treatment proves crucial for understanding, not only spillovers across markets, but also fundamental policy issues, such as the welfare effects of integration. In particular, integration of the engine with a small fraction of content providers is welfare-enhancing when incentives to distort are stronger for sponsored than organic search, but welfare-reducing in the opposite case.
Featured News
UK Regulator Puts Brakes on £762 Million Logistics Merger Amid Competition Fears
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Nvidia’s Acquisition of AI Startup Run.ai Faces EU Antitrust Review
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Voters Across US to Decide on Landmark Gig Economy Issues on November Ballots
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Court Gives Green Light to $110M Deal in Real Estate Commission Dispute
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Mexico’s First-Ever Class Action Targets Pharma Giants for Price Fixing
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI