Indian News Agency Sues OpenAI, Accuses ChatGPT of Using Content Without Permission
Indian news agency ANI has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in a New Delhi court, accusing the developer of ChatGPT of using its published content without permission to train its artificial intelligence model. According to ANI, OpenAI has not sought lawful permission or licensing to use their materials, a claim that the company has denied. The lawsuit follows similar legal actions globally, including in the United States, where major publications such as The New York Times and the Chicago Tribune have also taken OpenAI to court.
The first hearing of ANI’s case took place on Tuesday in the New Delhi High Court. During the session, the judge issued a notice to OpenAI, demanding a detailed response to ANI’s allegations. In its official statement, ANI emphasized that the case would address “the legitimacy of the use of publicly available proprietary content by AI platforms.”
ANI also accuses OpenAI of attributing fabricated news stories to its outlet, a claim detailed in court filings reviewed by Reuters. The agency’s legal submission from Monday outlines how OpenAI allegedly used ANI’s content without authorization, potentially causing damage to its reputation. The lawsuit adds to the growing list of legal challenges faced by OpenAI and other tech firms from authors, artists, and other copyright holders, who claim that their intellectual property has been used without consent.
Related: Elon Musk Expands OpenAI Suit, Adds Microsoft Over Antitrust Allegations
According to ANI, the lack of permission for using its original content puts it at a competitive disadvantage, as OpenAI has struck commercial partnerships with other news organizations, such as the Financial Times and Associated Press, to distribute their materials. These arrangements have led ANI to argue that OpenAI is benefiting from content in an unfair manner, without providing compensation or proper attribution to the original sources.
In response, OpenAI acknowledged that it collaborates with various news outlets worldwide and is in discussions to expand such partnerships, including in India. The company, however, continues to deny any copyright infringement and asserts that it has ceased the practice of using unlicensed content for its training purposes.
The court is scheduled to hear the case again on January 28, when both sides will present further arguments.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand