India’s proposed EU-like antitrust law is creating ripples of concern among major technology firms such as Apple, Google, Meta and Amazon. The new legislation, which is yet to be approved by parliament, sets forth stringent compliance obligations that could significantly impact the business models of these global tech behemoths.
The Indian government is currently reviewing a February report from a panel that suggested the introduction of a “Digital Competition Bill” to supplement existing antitrust laws. This development, first reported by Reuters, highlights the growing regulatory scrutiny on digital markets that are perceived to be increasingly dominated by a few large companies.
A prominent U.S. lobby group has already voiced its opposition to the proposed legislation, apprehensive about the potential business ramifications. The new law targets “systemically significant digital” companies, identified by a domestic turnover exceeding $480 million or a global turnover of over $30 billion, coupled with a local user base of at least 10 million for their digital services.
Related: UK Regulator Investigates Tech Giants’ AI Partnerships Amid Competition Concerns
According to the government panel, the necessity for new regulations stems from the digital market’s growing concentration, which grants a few large entities substantial control over the market dynamics. This concentration, the panel argues, forces smaller digital firms and startups to rely heavily on the larger companies, creating a significant imbalance in bargaining power.
The proposed bill mandates that companies operate in a fair and non-discriminatory manner. Non-compliance could result in severe penalties, with fines reaching up to 10% of a company’s global turnover, mirroring the stringent measures of the EU’s Digital Markets Act.
The tech industry is closely monitoring the progress of this legislation, aware that its enactment could usher in a new era of regulatory challenges in one of the world’s fastest-growing digital markets.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand