Italian competition regulators have levied a $6.4 million fine on DR Automobiles, a domestic car manufacturer, for allegedly marketing vehicles assembled from Chinese parts as “Made in Italy.” According to BBC News, the automaker is accused of misleading consumers who prefer to support locally produced goods, as the company primarily assembles vehicles using components from Chinese makers including Chery, BAIC, and JAC.
DR Automobiles plans to appeal the fine, arguing that it never claimed its vehicles were entirely made in Italy. The company maintains that it assembles affordable vehicles using pre-made parts.
The regulator’s findings indicate that vehicles under DR’s DR and EVO brands were marketed as Italian-made despite being largely composed of Chinese parts, with only minor assembly and finishing work conducted in Italy. This suggests that the vehicles were sold as completely built-up unit (CBU) kits rather than being genuinely manufactured in Italy.
In a statement, the regulator noted: “This practice has coincided with a period in which the company recorded marked growth in sales of DR and EVO vehicles in the Italian market.”
This incident follows a recent seizure of 134 Morocco-made Fiat Topolinos at the Italian port of Livorno due to their display of Italian-flag insignia. Parent company Stellantis stated it adhered to regulations but opted to remove the flags. Additionally, earlier this year, Stellantis was compelled to rename its Alfa Romeo Milano battery-electric vehicle to Junior after authorities highlighted that the cars were produced in Stellantis’s Polish plant.
The fine on DR Automobiles underscores the scrutiny Italian regulators are placing on the authenticity of “Made in Italy” claims, ensuring consumers are not misled about the origin of the products they purchase.
Source: BBC News
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh