Italian Carmaker DR Faces Antitrust Probe for Vehicle Origin Misrepresentation
Italian carmaker DR Automobiles finds itself in the crosshairs of an antitrust investigation, as authorities suspect the company of misleading consumers regarding the origin of its DR and EVO-branded vehicles. The Italian competition authority, known as AGCM, disclosed this on Thursday, unveiling a probe into the car manufacturer’s advertising and corporate website practices.
According to AGCM, DR Automobiles inaccurately conveyed information about the manufacturing locations of some of its vehicle models. The company, headquartered in the southern Italian region of Molise, assembles budget-friendly cars in Italy using components from Chinese automakers such as Chery, JAC, and BAIC, including fully electric models. These allegations come as DR and EVO saw a surge in sales, with approximately 24,200 vehicles sold in Italy during the first nine months of 2023, marking a 48% increase compared to the previous year. The brands also secured a 2% market share during this period.
Read more: EU Watchdogs Raid Auto Companies In Various Countries
The investigation took a more serious turn when AGCM, in collaboration with Italian tax police officials, conducted on-site inspections at both the DR Automobiles headquarters and its parent company, Donington Srl. This joint effort aims to delve deeper into the allegations of misrepresentation.
The core issue revolves around the alleged omission of crucial information about the origin of DR and EVO vehicles. AGCM’s statement suggests that the company may have insinuated, in certain instances, that their cars were entirely produced in Italy when, in fact, they appeared to be of Chinese production.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand