Japan Prepares ‘Digital Antitrust Law’ to Challenge Apple and Google App Store Policies
In a significant move to address concerns of monopoly in the mobile market, Japanese authorities are gearing up to introduce a “Digital Antitrust Law,” as reported by Nihon Keizai Shimbun. This new legislation aims to compel tech giants such as Apple and Google to open up their ecosystems by enabling “application sideloading” and allowing “third-party payment” options specifically within the Japanese market.
As of now, Google already permits the sideloading of applications on its Android platform. Consequently, the company might only need to navigate the third-party payment requirement in Japan. On the other hand, Apple, known for its closed iOS system, prohibits the sideloading of apps. Apple’s CEO, Tim Cook, expressed concerns about the potential risks associated with sideloading, emphasizing the difficulty of verifying the source and intentions of such applications.
Read more: Google’s Latest Play Store Suit Gets Class Action Status
The genesis of this impending legislation can be traced back to 2020 when Japanese authorities initiated investigations into antitrust issues involving major tech players, including Apple, Google, Amazon, Meta, and others. This year, regulatory agencies declared the completion of the probe, asserting that “Apple and Google dominate the mobile app platform, creating a monopoly.” Consequently, the Japanese authorities have deemed it imperative to formulate the “Digital Antitrust Law” to address the monopoly concerns.
The proposed law will mandate any company conducting business in the Japanese market to open its app store and third-party payment channels. If the legislation passes, the Japan Fair Trade Commission will wield the authority to impose fines on brands found in violation. The primary objective behind the law is to break the perceived monopoly held by Apple, Google, and other select brands in the Japanese mobile market.
Source: GIZ China
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh