A federal judge has granted reality star Kim Kardashian and boxer Floyd Mayweather an apparent victory in a lawsuit that accuses the celebrities of scamming cryptocurrency investors.
Kardashian and Mayweather were sued in January — along with former NBA star Paul Pierce — for allegedly making false and misleading statements while promoting EthereumMax.
As PYMNTS noted at the time, the suit — filed by an investor — claimed the cryptocurrency was a pump-and-dump scam and accused the celebrity defendants of “collaborating” with the executives to “misleadingly promote and sell the digital asset associated with EthereumMax.”
Read more: US Regulator Hit Kim Kardashian With $1.2M Fine For Crypto IG Posts
But in his ruling Monday (Nov. 7), U.S. District Judge Michael Fitzgerald said his “tentative” view is that attorneys for the investors are “trying to act” like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) but “haven’t chosen to view the tokens as a security” and didn’t use a standard securities fraud claim in their suit, Bloomberg reported.
The judge added that the celebrities didn’t “care to label the tokens as a security for obvious reasons,” per the report. He is set to issue a final written order later.
Fitzgerald’s ruling came a little more than a month after Kardashian was fined $1.26 million by the SEC for failing to mention that she was paid $225,000 to endorse EthereumMax when she posted about it on Instagram last June, directing her 228 million followers to a link where they could buy the cryptocurrency.
“This case is a reminder that, when celebrities or influencers endorse investment opportunities, including crypto asset securities, it doesn’t mean that those investment products are right for all investors,” SEC Chair Gary Gensler said in October.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand