In a victory for the U.S. Justice Department, a federal judge on Friday rejected Google’s request to move its antitrust lawsuit over online advertising to New York. The lawsuit, filed in late December, accused Google of using its power in the online advertising market to stifle competition.
“I am going to rule against you,” Judge Leonie Brinkema told an attorney for Google. The Virginia federal court is known for its rapid throughput, settling cases in a timely manner. The variety of plaintiffs and individual claims in the New York federal court, plus a case initiated by the Texas attorney general in 2020, ultimately make it more challenging to decide cases quickly. It’s expected that the process will take longer.
Justice Department attorney Julia Wood said there would be significant inefficiencies for the federal government if it were required to join the larger case being heard in New York.
Related: DOJ Opposes Google’s Attempt To Move Ad Antitrust Case To New York
Wood also said there were “meaningful differences” between the Justice Department’s case and many of the New York cases. “We respectfully request the court retain jurisdiction,” she said in a hearing.
Google has formally stated that it has not violated any rules or regulations in regard to its ad tech operations. An official comment was declined when asked whether Google intended to appeal the ruling issued by the court of venue; however, they provided assurance that they will continue leading in a highly dynamic and competitive market while also reinforcing their policies on fair competition.
The U.S. Justice Department’s antitrust case against Google is one of the most high-profile antitrust lawsuits in recent years. The DOJ alleges that Google has unlawfully maintained its monopoly power in the online advertising market to the detriment of consumers and businesses.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand