The NFL’s consideration of a broadcasting landscape without “Sunday Ticket” in 2017 has resurfaced as a critical element in a class-action lawsuit currently being deliberated by a jury. The plaintiffs, subscribers of “Sunday Ticket,” presented a league memo from April 21, 2017, titled “NFL New Frontier,” during their closing arguments on Wednesday.
The memo, which was shown to the jury, detailed a reimagined approach to Sunday afternoon NFL games, suggesting that all out-of-market games not aired on Fox or CBS could instead be broadcast on cable channels. This proposal would have significantly altered the current broadcasting model, wherein DirecTV has exclusive rights to these games through its “Sunday Ticket” package.
According to the memo, under this new model, Fox and CBS would have paid approximately 25% less per game, equating to around $10 million per game. In contrast, cable networks would have contributed $9 million per game, matching the average payment made by DirecTV under its contract with the NFL.
Related: NFL Faces Antitrust Trial Over ‘Sunday Ticket’ Telecast in Los Angeles
The jury began deliberations on Wednesday afternoon after receiving instructions from U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez. The day’s proceedings included the plaintiffs’ closing statement in the morning, followed by the NFL’s final remarks after lunch. The plaintiffs then had a 20-minute rebuttal session. The jury met for 90 minutes before adjourning for the day, with deliberations set to continue on Thursday.
This three-week trial has been marked by high-profile testimonies from NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones. The 2017 memo has emerged as one of the most significant revelations, shedding light on the league’s considerations and potential shifts in its broadcasting strategies.
Source: AP News
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand