The U.S. Justice Department has accused Swedish lock maker Assa Abloy of violating a settlement agreement tied to its $4.3 billion acquisition of Spectrum Brands’ hardware and home improvement unit last year. According to Reuters, the allegations, filed in a Washington, D.C. court on Tuesday, claim that Assa Abloy has failed to compensate a court-appointed monitor overseeing the company’s adherence to the settlement terms.
Allegations of Payment Default
The Justice Department’s filing asserts that Assa Abloy ceased payments to the monitor, Hausfeld’s Melinda Coolidge, in February. This action, according to the filing, represents a breach of the settlement agreement which was designed to resolve antitrust claims. The original lawsuit by the Justice Department aimed to block the acquisition on the grounds that it would lead to increased prices in the market.
Dispute Over Monitor’s Role and Fees
The settlement, reached during a trial before U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, did not include an admission of wrongdoing by Assa Abloy. However, the terms required the company to fund a monitorship to ensure compliance. Coolidge, the U.S. managing partner at Hausfeld, a major plaintiffs’ firm, charges $920 per hour for her services. In an April letter to Assa Abloy, she dismissed the company’s objections to her fees as “unfounded.”
In June, Assa Abloy formally objected to Coolidge’s fees, arguing that the costs could surpass $20 million over the monitorship period. The company has requested the court to limit Coolidge’s scope, claiming she overstepped her authority by proposing an industry-wide, five-year study on smart locks. The Justice Department contends that this study is a crucial part of her mandate.
The Justice Department has requested a court order to compel Assa Abloy to resume payments. A hearing on this matter is scheduled for July 9 before Judge Reyes. Both Assa Abloy and Coolidge have not responded to requests for comments, while the Justice Department has declined to comment on the ongoing case.
Assa Abloy, known for brands such as Yale, August, and EMTEK, acquired Spectrum’s division, which includes Baldwin and Kwikset brands. This case, United States v. Assa Abloy and Spectrum Brands, is being heard in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand