Legal boundaries of Competition in the Area of Internet: Challenges and Judicial Responses
Zhu Li, March 20, 2016
Some new characteristics of competition in the Internet industry, e.g., competition for attention, innovation competition, cross-market competition etc., have brought about new challenges and difficulties for the legal regulation of competition. In virtue of the theoretical innovation and the innovation of law applicability, Chinese courts gave creative judicial responses in the scopes of Anti-Unfair Competition Law and antitrust Law, clarified the legal boundaries of competition and effectively regulated competition in the online environment. Certain trends and rules implicit in this kind of judicial responses are worth noting.
The growth of the Internet industry in our country has become a new engine for the development of domestic economy. The online technology has been updating rapidly; new products, new services and new business models have been emerging uninterruptedly, impacting existing models and established order of the traditional commercial community, changing the structure of commercial interests in the economy and the society. This process is accompanied with the increasingly fierce competition in the Internet area and the continuous emergence of new kind of competition that constantly challenge legal boundaries. At the early stage of Internet development, the challenge had mostly appeared to be the difficulties in protecting online copyright. In pace with the maturity and progress of the Internet technology, the scale of e-commerce enlarges rapidly, new business models relying on the Internet are emerging uninterruptedly, therefore the mentioned challenge has expanded to areas such as trademark protection, competition regulation, etc. in the Internet. By examining specific cases, Chinese courts have clarified and delimited competition rules on the internet, filled the legal gaps, and thus, played an important role in the regulation of competition on the Internet. First, the paper describes the characteristics of competition on the Internet. Second, it explores the special challenges this kind of competition has brought to the judicature, and third, the paper will analyze the creative judicial responses to the challenge, and endeavor to reveal the trend and the regular pattern in such judicial actions.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
CMA Fines Tereos £25,000 for Failing to Provide Key Information in Merger Probe
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Google Defends Its Role in Online Advertising Market in Antitrust Trial
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Musk’s X Requests Brazil Supreme Court to Resume Service After Shutdown
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
Visa Acquires AI Firm Featurespace to Enhance Fraud Prevention
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
Visa Gears Up for Legal Fight with DOJ Over Debit Card Monopoly Allegations
Sep 26, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh