![](https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/EU-instant-payments.jpg)
In a blow to Lufthansa, the second-highest court in Europe ruled in favor of Ryanair, annulling a decision by the European Union competition regulator to clear Lufthansa’s state bailout. The ruling, announced on Wednesday, highlighted errors in the EU competition regulators’ decision-making process and underscored the absence of incentives for prompt repayment.
Lufthansa, Germany’s flagship carrier, had already repaid the full 6-billion-euro ($6.60 billion) rescue package provided by the German government, potentially mitigating immediate repercussions. However, the ruling could have broader implications for future state aid in the aviation sector.
Following the court’s decision, Lufthansa stated it would determine its next steps after thoroughly analyzing the ruling. Meanwhile, Germany’s economy ministry expressed uncertainty about the judgment’s impact, indicating plans to scrutinize it further.
Margrethe Vestager, the EU’s top competition official, acknowledged the ruling, asserting that “all options” were being considered but refrained from specifying the next course of action.
Read more: Lufthansa Faces EU Antitrust Warning Over ITA Airways Stake Bid
This legal battle between Lufthansa and Ryanair is part of a broader campaign by the low-cost carrier against state aid provided to its competitors during the pandemic. Ryanair has consistently argued that such aid distorts competition, alleging that the European Commission cleared these bailouts under lenient rules designed to aid pandemic-hit companies.
In addition to Lufthansa, the court also ruled against pandemic state aid measures for Scandinavian Airlines (SAS), siding with Ryanair’s contention that the rescue package lacked sufficient incentives for the Swedish and Danish governments to exit quickly.
Reacting to the verdict, a Ryanair spokesperson emphasized the need for the Commission to safeguard fair competition in the aviation industry and criticized what it deemed as succumbing to political pressure from national governments.
However, SAS remains unfazed by the ruling’s implications on its operations. The airline assured customers that flight schedules and bookings would remain unaffected. Furthermore, SAS reiterated its ongoing Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection status, initiated last year.
In response to the ruling, SAS clarified that while the court identified a flaw in the EU Commission’s decision, it did not automatically render the state’s participation in SAS’s recapitalization as illegal state aid. The airline anticipated a reassessment by the EU Commission and reiterated confidence in gaining approval for measures taken since 2020, including the involvement of the United States in the bankruptcy process.
Lufthansa and several other European airlines resorted to state aid amid the prolonged downturn in travel caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Source: UK Movies Yahoo
Featured News
House Oversight Panel to Probe Pharmacy Benefit Managers’ Role in Rising Healthcare Costs
Jul 16, 2024 by
CPI
Spanish Train Maker Talgo Receives Merger Offer from Czech Rival Skoda
Jul 16, 2024 by
CPI
Yandex Finalizes $5.4 B Asset Split, Marking Major Corporate Exit and Birth of New AI Venture
Jul 16, 2024 by
CPI
Tesla Switches Legal Teams in California Antitrust Class Action, Court Records Reveal
Jul 16, 2024 by
CPI
Citigroup Fined $136 Million for Insufficient Progress on Data Management Issues
Jul 16, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Private Equity Roll-Up Schemes
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
The FTC’s Focus on Private Equity is Warranted
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Unraveling the Roll-Up: Private Equity’s Misunderstood Investment Strategy
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Focus on Private Equity Funds and Serial Acquisitions
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Private Equity Roll-Ups Amidst Heightened Antitrust Enforcement
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI