In a recent legal development, prominent hotel chain operators including Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., Hyatt Hotels Corp., Inter-Continental Hotels Corp., Marriott International Inc., and Accor Management find themselves embroiled in a lawsuit alleging collusion to inflate luxury hotel room prices. The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington, accuses these industry giants of engaging in anti-competitive practices facilitated by a price-setting database.
The complaint, lodged on Tuesday, outlines that customers seeking luxury accommodations were allegedly subjected to inflated prices due to a clandestine agreement among the hotel chains to share confidential information regarding pricing, supply, and future strategies. Acting as the intermediary in this alleged scheme is Smith Travel Research (STR), a division of CoStar Group Inc., named as co-defendants in the lawsuit.
According to the plaintiffs, STR facilitated the exchange of competitively sensitive data, allowing the accused hotel operators to gain insights into each other’s pricing strategies and adjust their own prices accordingly. By having access to detailed and non-public information through STR, the defendants purportedly manipulated the market dynamics, stifling competition and enabling them to charge higher prices for luxury accommodations.
“The agreement to regularly exchange detailed and non-public information about current supply and pricing suppressed competition between the defendants,” the lawsuit states. “The information exchanges allowed defendant hotel operators to compare their prices and occupancy with their competitors and to raise prices when they were lower than competitors.”
The implications of such alleged collusion extend beyond individual customers to the broader hospitality industry. If proven true, this coordinated effort to control pricing could have far-reaching consequences for consumer choice and market competition within the luxury hotel sector.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand