Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, a major freight train company, has been hit with a lawsuit from a rival manufacturer. According to Progress Rail, a railway division of Caterpillar (CAT. N) based in Albertville, Alabama, they are challenging what they allege are Westinghouse Air Brake’s “exclusionary” deals and other anticompetitive behaviors.
Progress Rail claims that they are in direct competition with Westinghouse in the development, manufacture and sale of long-haul freight trains, components and technology systems. The lawsuit alleges that “such unchecked conduct will make the freight locomotives that drive this country’s economy more expensive, less safe, and worse for the environment.”
The lawsuit seeks to have Pittsburgh-based Westinghouse Air Brake, which does business under the name Wabtec, divest the GE Transportation Unit that they bought over a year ago in an $11 billion deal. Executives from Progress Rail allege that Westinghouse Air Brake is profiting from unlawful, exclusionary conduct that limits competition and places an extra burden on consumers.
Prior to the purchase of GE’s transportation unit, Westinghouse was not a major player in the locomotive industry. In 2019, the U.S. Justice Department reviewed the deal but decided to not take any action to block the merger. After the approval, the two companies signed an ‘interchangeability agreement’ in which Westinghouse committed to continue an open marketplace for locomotive cab electronics and other products. This is the same agreement that Progress Rail is claiming Westinghouse is breaking.
Progress Rail is striving to put a stop to this conduct that they allege is costing consumers more and affecting their safety and the environment. To ensure this, they are seeking triple damages under U.S. antitrust laws as well as a court order forcing Westinghouse to sell off the GE transportation unit.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand